Article 91335 of alt.sysadmin.recovery:
From: art@flying.broomstick.com (Arthur Hagen)
Newsgroups: alt.sysadmin.recovery
Subject: Re: I do not like stupidity.
Date: Mon, 12 Oct 1998 00:08:15 +0200
Organization: Broomstick Net Services
Lines: 61
Approved: uhrm
Message-ID: <f8arv6.8p4.ln@flying.broomstick.com>
References: <m2iui1rghm.fsf@gdjones.demon.co.uk><6vgar5$2t4$1@nnrp03.primenet.com> <CxcBPQAJ19G2Iw73@larien.demon.co.uk><m3r9wjo3vt.fsf@obelix.wegge.dk> <v34stffc6e.fsf@softlab.se> <VMpUQFAYnQH2Iwj4@larien.demon.co.uk> <1180.586T322T3582979@mistral.co.uk>
Reply-To: art@broomstick.com
NNTP-Posting-Host: flying.broomstick.com
Path: news1.meer.net!nntp2.ba.best.com!news3.best.com!news1.best.com!nntprelay.mathworks.com!btnet-peer!btnet!news-lond.gip.net!news-stkh.gip.net!news.gsl.net!gip.net!globalone.no!flying!art
Xref: news1.meer.net alt.sysadmin.recovery:91335


In article <1180.586T322T3582979@mistral.co.uk>, "Adam Atkinson" <ghira@mistral.co.uk> writes:

> The Italian way for doing long multiplication or long division (can't
> remember which) looks nothing like the way I do it. This has led to
> problems when I've had to do calculations on blackboards in Italy.
> Either my audience says "What on earth is all that?" or I try to
> struggle through the Italian way of laying it all out and get myself
> into a mess.

Probably division.  Here in Norway, people have been taught to do that
in at least 4 different ways, which of two still are taught in school.

To divide 1773 by 30, you do either of:

     59,1
   +-----
30 | 1773
---+ 150
     ---
      273
      270
      ---
        30
	30
	--
	 0

or

 1773 : 30
 1500   50
 ----
  273
  270    9
  ---
    3   
    3    0.1
    -   ----
    0   59.1
        ====
or

   1773
 :   30   (scribble, scribble, guesswork, scribble goes here)
 -------- (and here)
     59,1 (and here)
 ======== (and here)

or

  1773        1773-50*30        273        273-9*30         3       1
  ---- = 50 + ---------- = 50 + --- = 59 + -------- = 59 + -- = 59 --
    30            30             30           30           30      10

I tend to prefer the top one, as it deals with smaller numbers,
although it wastes paper.

Regards,
-- 
*Art


