Article 6073 of comp.dcom.telecom.tech:
Path: mri-gw!psinntp!psinntp!cmcl2!panix!news.mathworks.com!udel!gatech!newsxfer.itd.umich.edu!news.cic.net!condor.ic.net!news
From: pcr@ic.net (phil reed)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom.tech
Subject: Re: NEW: Internet Phone - Free Telephone Calls Over The Internet
Date: 9 Mar 1995 12:39:45 GMT
Organization: Black Cat Brewery
Lines: 39
Distribution: inet
Message-ID: <3jmsuh$doj@condor.ic.net>
References: <NEWTNews.6161.794190612.Postmaster@vt.intac.com>,<3jf5i5$bah@owen.mitel.com> <1995Mar6.160928.6520@nb.rockwell.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: 152.160.40.20
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.93.11

In article <1995Mar6.160928.6520@nb.rockwell.com>, manfredi@engr04.comsys.rockwell.com says...
>
>In article <3jf5i5$bah@owen.mitel.com>, meier@software.mitel.com (Rolf Meier) wr
>ites:
>>Consider the following:
>>
>>1)  The Internet has been heavily susidized by taxpayers.
>
>Indeed. And wasn't it in the news that the govt would be backing out of
>the heavy subsidies in the next few years? I think that not only would
>voice over the Internet not be free for long, but nothing will. I wonder
>what that will mean and how individuals or corporations will be charged
>for Internet use?

The Internet consists of data circuits and routers. Data circuits are almost
all flat rate these days, and routers are capital equipment. So, all an internet
provider really has to do is provide data circuits to routers, and stand back.
Charge each user the flat rate (marked up appropriately), plus a fraction of
the cost of running the routers, and a fraction of the cost of running a line
to another provider's router. *POOF* Internet. There is no incremental cost 
for more or less data. If the user wants more bandwidth, they pay a larger
flat rate for a bigger data circuit. Sure, the infrastructure cost goes up,
so you factor that into the flat rate. 

I imagine the phone companies want to charge by the byte or something. (Telenet
charged by the kilobyte for ages.) But the market has passed those charge
rates by long ago, and I don't think the customers will stand to go back. All
it takes is one company to continue offering a flat rate service, and they
all will have to.


>
>Bert
>manfredi@engr05.comsys.rockwell.com
>
 
--
                             ...phil



