Article: 147497 of sci.geo.satellite-nav
From: Antonio Tabernero Galan <ant@fi.upm.es>
Newsgroups: sci.geo.satellite-nav
Subject: Re: Garmin 12XL and raw data
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 11:52:21 +0200
Organization: Universidad Politecnica Madrid
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <392A54D5.E531577E@fi.upm.es>
References: <3920F24A.8FE410B2@nlr.nl> <3921e342_2@news1.prserv.net> <x7ya5at3qo.fsf@capsicum.wsrcc.com> <8gcd7j$b38$1@panix5.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hyundai.ls.fi.upm.es
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: panoramix.fi.upm.es 959075614 15693 138.100.10.50 (23 May 2000 09:53:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@panoramix.fi.upm.es
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 May 2000 09:53:34 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.10 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
Path: news1.meer.net!news3.best.com!news2.best.com!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news-ge.switch.ch!news.rediris.es!news-2.rediris.es!138.100.251.9.MISMATCH!news.upm.es!panoramix.fi.upm.es!not-for-mail
Xref: news1.meer.net sci.geo.satellite-nav:147497

Kenneth Crudup wrote:

> Does anyone know if the basic GPS 12 has this mode, too?
>
>         -Kenny

Yes.  I have been playing with it a while and I can send /post to you more
detailed information if you're interested.  I was thrilled  at the beginning
considering the possibility of post processing data. However, I was quite
disappointed when I examined more carefully the 0x38 records. While
bits 14-21 (starting from 0) do correspond to a double with a good-looking
value of  about 20,000,000  (Pseudorange in meters), I found that at least
in my Garmin12 (ver 4.00) those numbers were always increasing by about
6000 every  second , as if all the sats and I were in an expansive universe.

Consequently, after a 20 minute observation, the pseudoranges (by now
pseudo-pseudoranges) had values around  35,000,000 (all of them), which
didn't make much sense to me.  I decided that a further coding of the data
existed and reluctantly dropped the subject. That's  why I have been
nicely surprised with the  last post from  Sam Storm van Leeuwen reporting
successful postprocessing  of that data, and that's why I would appreciate
his further commenting on those results:

* Is there any additional corrections needed to get pseudoranges from
   record 0x38?

* Could it be a version/unit-dependent problem? Has anyone gotten
   meaningful pseudoranges (without the ever-increasing trend) with a
   Garmin12 (version ?).

I'd be glad to put together a report of what it is known about async messages
in Garmin units containing raw data.

   Antonio

PS:  by the way, the  increment  in psedoranges (bits 14-21 of record 0x38)
        is similar -but not equal- to a float  that appears in bits 0-3 in record

        0x16. Could it be two different measures of the same quantity, let's say
        integrated Doppler vs. difference of pseudoranges?.  This two numbers
        are also related  to a  counter  placed in an unsigned long in bits 0-3
of
        record 0x38. This counter gets incremented by about 60-70,000,000 every
        second., and its increment is closely related (except for a factor) to
the
        float in bits 0-3 of record  0x16.


--
                             Antonio Tabernero Galan
                             E-mail:  ant@fi.upm.es
                             Facultad de Informatica (UPM).
                             28660 Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain.





Article: 147497 of sci.geo.satellite-nav
From: Antonio Tabernero Galan <ant@fi.upm.es>
Newsgroups: sci.geo.satellite-nav
Subject: Re: Garmin 12XL and raw data
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 11:52:21 +0200
Organization: Universidad Politecnica Madrid
Lines: 56
Message-ID: <392A54D5.E531577E@fi.upm.es>
References: <3920F24A.8FE410B2@nlr.nl> <3921e342_2@news1.prserv.net> <x7ya5at3qo.fsf@capsicum.wsrcc.com> <8gcd7j$b38$1@panix5.panix.com>
NNTP-Posting-Host: hyundai.ls.fi.upm.es
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Trace: panoramix.fi.upm.es 959075614 15693 138.100.10.50 (23 May 2000 09:53:34 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: news@panoramix.fi.upm.es
NNTP-Posting-Date: 23 May 2000 09:53:34 GMT
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.61 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.10 i686)
X-Accept-Language: en
Path: news1.meer.net!news3.best.com!news2.best.com!feed1.news.rcn.net!rcn!newsfeed.cwix.com!newsfeed.mathworks.com!news-ge.switch.ch!news.rediris.es!news-2.rediris.es!138.100.251.9.MISMATCH!news.upm.es!panoramix.fi.upm.es!not-for-mail
Xref: news1.meer.net sci.geo.satellite-nav:147497

Kenneth Crudup wrote:

> Does anyone know if the basic GPS 12 has this mode, too?
>
>         -Kenny

Yes.  I have been playing with it a while and I can send /post to you more
detailed information if you're interested.  I was thrilled  at the beginning
considering the possibility of post processing data. However, I was quite
disappointed when I examined more carefully the 0x38 records. While
bits 14-21 (starting from 0) do correspond to a double with a good-looking
value of  about 20,000,000  (Pseudorange in meters), I found that at least
in my Garmin12 (ver 4.00) those numbers were always increasing by about
6000 every  second , as if all the sats and I were in an expansive universe.

Consequently, after a 20 minute observation, the pseudoranges (by now
pseudo-pseudoranges) had values around  35,000,000 (all of them), which
didn't make much sense to me.  I decided that a further coding of the data
existed and reluctantly dropped the subject. That's  why I have been
nicely surprised with the  last post from  Sam Storm van Leeuwen reporting
successful postprocessing  of that data, and that's why I would appreciate
his further commenting on those results:

* Is there any additional corrections needed to get pseudoranges from
   record 0x38?

* Could it be a version/unit-dependent problem? Has anyone gotten
   meaningful pseudoranges (without the ever-increasing trend) with a
   Garmin12 (version ?).

I'd be glad to put together a report of what it is known about async messages
in Garmin units containing raw data.

   Antonio

PS:  by the way, the  increment  in psedoranges (bits 14-21 of record 0x38)
        is similar -but not equal- to a float  that appears in bits 0-3 in record

        0x16. Could it be two different measures of the same quantity, let's say
        integrated Doppler vs. difference of pseudoranges?.  This two numbers
        are also related  to a  counter  placed in an unsigned long in bits 0-3
of
        record 0x38. This counter gets incremented by about 60-70,000,000 every
        second., and its increment is closely related (except for a factor) to
the
        float in bits 0-3 of record  0x16.


--
                             Antonio Tabernero Galan
                             E-mail:  ant@fi.upm.es
                             Facultad de Informatica (UPM).
                             28660 Boadilla del Monte, Madrid, Spain.





