Article: 27242 of sci.geo.satellite-nav From: Dust Devil Newsgroups: sci.geo.satellite-nav Subject: Re: old survey marker Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:23:31 -0700 Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com Message-ID: References: <3CDBDB72.6AF8C33C@FinalApproach.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.91/32.564 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Complaints-To: newsabuse@supernews.com Lines: 27 Path: news.meer.net!dfw-read.news.verio.net!dfw-artgen!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!newsfeed.stueberl.de!newsfeed.vmunix.org!fr.clara.net!heighliner.fr.clara.net!proxad.net!freenix!sn-xit-01!sn-post-01!supernews.com!corp.supernews.com!not-for-mail Xref: archive.mv.meer.net sci.geo.satellite-nav:27242 >Though I had $250 handy, I didn't touch the marker. I wouldn't say the soil >in the area is very stable, but I doubt it moved two miles on it's own. The >marker is on the side of a wash. > >The area in particular is extremely rural. The closest town would be Elgin, >population under a dozen I guess, about 5 miles away. Why are you hanging around Elgin? The only UFOs are south of Rachel. >> g wrote: >> > >> > FWIW, the coordinates are N37 14.760 W114 30.292 wgs84 (measured on an >emap, >> > but not much averaging) >> >> There doesn't appear to be anything within 2 miles of that location... >Was the >> marker firmly attached to the ground?? It may have been moved... >> -- >> Jack Jack, the only thing around those parts are a few cows and what looks like some kind of a survivalist camp along the creek to the east. It's a long ways to nowhere from that place. Gary M