Article: 4764 of sci.geo.satellite-nav
From: jltodaro@unix.asb.com (Jim Todaro)
Newsgroups: sci.geo.satellite-nav
Subject: Re: Four Corners Location?
Message-ID: <3b8e4fc6.11669720@news.i-2000.com>
References: <dJTi7.86640$A47.43051515@news1.rsm1.occa.home.com>
X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.5/32.451
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Lines: 36
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 02:21:06 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 207.97.189.79
X-Complaints-To: abuse@i-2000.com
X-Trace: newsreader.i-2000.net 999051267 207.97.189.79 (Tue, 28 Aug 2001 22:14:27 EDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2001 22:14:27 EDT
Path: news.meer.net!sea-read.news.verio.net!dfw-artgen.news.verio.net!dfw-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!news.maxwell.syr.edu!news-peer1.sprintlink.net!news-in-central.sprintlink.net!news.sprintlink.net!newsfeed.i-2000.net!newsreader.i-2000.net.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: archive.mv.meer.net sci.geo.satellite-nav:4764

Presuming that Four Corners is supposed to be at N37.00000 W109.00000,
I asked my Streets and Trips 2001, Sony Skymap and MapSens Streets
where they thought that was. The monument that is, which is in a
little circle off of US-160.

S&T2001=  36.99912N  109.04520W  (2.50 miles W of N37  W109)
Sony Skymap= 37.003326N 109.050400W
Mapsend Streest= N36D, 54.94 min  W 109D, 02.71 min



On Tue, 28 Aug 2001 21:06:17 GMT, "Greg Marshall" <gregm@home.com>
wrote:

>Just finished a trip through the US Southwest, including a visit to the Four
>Corners tourist location (trap?) at the point where Colorado, Utah, Arizona
>and New Mexico meet. According to my GPS, the integer latitude and longitude
>closest to this point is several hundred metres more or less north west of
>the location of the monument. My GPSIII+ is normally quite a bit more
>accurate than that...
>Questions:
>1. Is this confluence supposed to be at integer latitude and longitude? If
>it is...
>
>2. Is there some history of inaccuracy in the survey that would account for
>it?
>3. Could it be that the first nations folks that run the market there have
>relocated it a tad to keep their construction costs down. The terrain over
>in the direction of the integer lat-long is pretty rough and would need a
>lot of fill to turn it into a parking lot?
>
>Why am I so suspicious?
>
>Greg
>



