Article: 5743 of sci.geo.satellite-nav
From: "Arthur Hass" <karen-hass@home.com>
Newsgroups: sci.geo.satellite-nav
References: <dJTi7.86640$A47.43051515@news1.rsm1.occa.home.com> <9mhgl3$fqs$1@lily.cs.ubc.ca> <Xns9111CA44F5F39mrzaphoddirectca@198.161.156.10> <20010904.7950CF8.8F6A@mojaveg.iwvisp.com>
Subject: Re: Four Corners Location?
Lines: 50
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.50.4133.2400
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.50.4133.2400
Message-ID: <Sc8l7.62630$hT4.16177399@news1.rdc1.md.home.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 17:30:26 GMT
NNTP-Posting-Host: 24.18.170.159
X-Complaints-To: abuse@home.net
X-Trace: news1.rdc1.md.home.com 999624626 24.18.170.159 (Tue, 04 Sep 2001 10:30:26 PDT)
NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 04 Sep 2001 10:30:26 PDT
Organization: Excite@Home - The Leader in Broadband http://home.com/faster
Path: news.meer.net!sea-read.news.verio.net!dfw-artgen.news.verio.net!dfw-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!crtntx1-snh1.gtei.net!cpk-news-hub1.bbnplanet.com!news.gtei.net!newshub2.home.com!news.home.com!news1.rdc1.md.home.com.POSTED!not-for-mail
Xref: archive.mv.meer.net sci.geo.satellite-nav:5743

Yes.  It's at:

N36.893504 W106.582592

Looks like they were off by a couple of thousand feet.

Arthur Hass
Reston, VA

"Everett M. Greene" <mojaveg@iwvisp.com> wrote in message
news:20010904.7950CF8.8F6A@mojaveg.iwvisp.com...
> dpatton@remove-for-nospam.direct.ca (Dave Patton) writes:
> > davem@cs.ubc.ca (Dave Martindale) wrote in
<9mhgl3$fqs$1@lily.cs.ubc.ca>:
> > >"Greg Marshall" <gregm@home.com> writes:
> > >
> > >>2. Is there some history of inaccuracy in the survey that would
account
> > >>for it?
> > >
> > >Probably just the accuracy of the tools they had then.  For another
> > >similar example, look at the US-Canada border (between Lake Superior
and
> > >the west coast) compared to 49 degrees north latitude on a decent-scale
> > >topographic map.  There's quite a bit of error sometimes.
> > >
> > >The surveyors did the best they could when setting up a bunch of
> > >monuments, and now the border is defined by those monuments, not the
> > >precise 49 degree latitude.
> >
> > If anyone wants to see a list of the actual boundary monuments,
> > and their positions, that define the entire Canada/US border,
> > go to the International Boundary Commission website at:
> > http://www.geocan.nrcan.gc.ca/ibc/ibcprod.htm#coord
>
> Another related question has to do with the 37N line that's
> the boundary for Arizona, New Mexico, and Oklahoma.  If you
> look at a detailed map of the Colorado/New Mexico border
> around Chama, NM, you'll notice a "glitch".  Is this due to
> the line having been surveyed from opposite directions and
> the ends didn't quite meet?
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> Everett M. Greene  (The Mojave Greene, crotalus scutulatus scutulatus)
> Ridgecrest, Ca. 93555           Path: mojaveg@IWVISP.com
>
> While a positive attitude won't always make things better,
> it will annoy enough people to make it worthwhile.




