Article: 62664 of sci.geo.satellite-nav From: see.my.sig@bigpond.com (Noel Bachelor) Newsgroups: sci.geo.satellite-nav Subject: Re: Town shifted nearly 7 inches in year Organization: Language Recordings Inc. (Darwin, Australia) Reply-To: Noel Bachelor Message-ID: <3e47aa9d.23345189@news.bigpond.com> References: <20030209090853.21442.00001084@mb-mu.aol.com> <3e467766.13175074@news.bellatlantic.net> X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.21/32.243 Lines: 17 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 09:20:52 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 144.134.1.193 X-Trace: newsfeeds.bigpond.com 1044954630 144.134.1.193 (Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:10:30 EST) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:10:30 EST Path: news.meer.net!sea-read.news.verio.net!dfw-artgen!iad-peer.news.verio.net!news.verio.net!newsfeed.icl.net!newsfeed.fjserv.net!skynet.be!skynet.be!newspush.london1.eu.level3.net!level3eu!newsfeed.mathworks.com!lon-transit.news.telstra.net!news.telstra.net!newsfeeds.bigpond.com!not-for-mail Xref: archive.mv.meer.net sci.geo.satellite-nav:62664 On or about Sun, 09 Feb 2003 15:47:19 GMT, Gary S. allegedly wrote: > Other than breaking apart building foundations, water pipes, roads and > other infrastructure, potentially making the town uninhabitable and > unsellable, no big deal. Yes, even without damage, there would be some interesting consequences. Like, you get a surveyor to check your boundaries, and find you really own half of your house, half of one neigbour's, and the back shed of another. I presume they'd have to keep adjusting the references of local survey markers to reduce this problem. Noel Bachelor noelbachelorAT(From:_domain) S 12.416980 E130.922680